Rubrics
You are viewing the first edition of this textbook. A second edition is available – please visit the latest edition for updated information.
This page contains the following rubrics:
- Composing a Title Rubric
- Creating a Research Question Rubric
- Positing a Thesis Statement Rubric
- Creating an Annotated Bibliography Rubric
- Creating a Literature Review Rubric
- Creating an Abstract Rubric
TASK: Compose a Title | |||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | |
References the literary work, theory, and/or method | The title references the student’s chosen literary work, theory, and/or method. | The title is vague about the student’s chosen literary work, theory, and/or method. | The title does not reference the student’s chosen literary work, theory, and/or method at all. |
Clarity | The reader knows exactly what to expect from the student’s work. | The reader isn’t exactly sure what to expect from the student’s work just yet. | The reader has no idea what to expect from the student’s work based on the title. |
Grammar/Mechanics | MLA or APA is used correctly in the title. Grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly in the title, but with mistakes. Some awkward word choices or phrases as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | The title contains multiple incorrect sentence structures and lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. |
References Thesis Statement* | The title references the chosen argument.* | The title only slightly references the chosen argument.* | The title does not reference the chosen argument at all.* |
* Note: Titles that reference thesis statements and arguments may be OPTIONAL. Please check with your instructor.
Creating a Research Question Rubric
TASK: Create a Research Question | |||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | |
Clear, Complex, and Focused Question | The research question is clear, complex, and focused. It is not unnecessarily loaded or leaning. It sets up a researchable and realistic project. | The research question remains too broad or too narrow. It is somewhat unnecessarily loaded or leaning. It is not very researchable and the project it sets up is not very realistic. The research question requires refining. | The research question is extremely broad or narrow. It is very unnecessarily loaded or leaning. It is not researchable and sets up an unrealistic project. The research question requires major refining. |
Arguable Answers | The possible answers to the research question (the thesis) are arguable. These answers can be much more than just “yes” or “no.” | The possible answers to the research question (the thesis) are only partially arguable. These answers can be only slightly more than just “yes” or “no.” | The possible answers to the research question (the thesis) are unarguable. These answers can only be a mere “yes” or “no.” |
Relevance to the scholarly conversation | The research question is relevant to the scholarly conversation and includes key concepts in the discipline. Other researchers and scholars are likely to be highly interested in the question. | The research question is somewhat relevant to the scholarly conversation and may be missing a key concept. Other researchers and scholars may only be slightly interested in this discourse. | The research question does not add anything of value to the scholarly conversation and is lacking any key concepts. Other researchers and scholars would not be interested in this question. |
Question relates to available scholarly sources and evidence | Key research sources and evidence are available and relate directly to the research question. | Key research sources and evidence may only partially available and may only partially relate to the research question. | Key research sources and evidence are not available and/or do not relate to the research question. |
Grammar/Mechanics | MLA or APA is used correctly throughout the research question. Sentence structure as well as grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly throughout the research question, but with mistakes. Some awkward sentences appear as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | The research question contains multiple incorrect sentence structures and lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. |
Positing a Thesis Statement Rubric
TASK: Posit a Thesis Statement | ||||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | ||||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | ||
Clarity | The thesis statement clearly conveys the argument and answers the research question. The reader knows what to expect from the work. | The thesis statement only slightly conveys the argument and/or answers the research question. The reader isn’t sure what to expect from the work. | The thesis statement does not convey the argument and does not answer the research question. The reader has no idea what to expect from the work. | |
Arguable | The thesis statement is arguable. Other answers are possible, but they are not as strong as this thesis statement. | The thesis statement is only partially arguable, or other answers are possible, but they are just as strong as this thesis statement. | The thesis statement is unarguable, or other answers are possible, but they are stronger than this particular thesis statement.
|
|
Meaningful Discourse | The thesis statement situates claims in existing scholarly discourse. It adds value to the scholarly conversation. | The thesis statement partially situates claims in existing scholarly discourse. It does not add much value to the scholarly conversation. | The thesis statement does not situate claims in existing scholarly discourse. It does not add any value to the scholarly conversation. | |
Position | Takes a supportable position on the chosen topic and acknowledges other positions. | Takes a supportable position on the chosen topic, but fails to acknowledge other positions. | Does not take a supportable position on their chosen topic. | |
Effectiveness | Thesis statement is specific, relevant, and compelling. It effectively organizes all the points made in the rest of the work. | Thesis statement is only slightly specific, relevant, and/or compelling. It partially organizes all the points made in the rest of the work. | Thesis statement is not specific, relevant, and/or compelling. It does not organize the points made in the rest of the work. | |
Grammar/Mechanics | MLA or APA is used correctly in the thesis statement. Sentence structure as well as grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly in the thesis statement, but with mistakes. Some awkward phrases or sentences appear as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | The thesis statement contains multiple incorrect phrase or sentence structures and lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. |
Creating an Annotated Bibliography Rubric
TASK: Create an Annotated Bibliography | |||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | |
Quality/Reliability of Sources | Gathers a sufficient number of appropriate sources, which are highly relevant and credible. | Gathers a few appropriate sources, which are somewhat relevant and credible. | Does not gather enough sources; sources are not appropriate or relevant, or lack credibility. |
Currency of Sources | Includes sufficiently current content. | Lacks some sufficiently current content. | Current content is entirely lacking. |
Summarization | Summarizes the relevant ideas of chosen sources, states the purpose of the resource, and discusses the resource’s contribution to the topic. | Vaguely summarizes the relevant ideas of chosen sources. Most entries state the purpose of the resource and the resource’s contribution to the topic. | Does not adequately summarize the main ideas of chosen sources. Does not state the purpose of the resource nor the resource’s contribution to the topic. |
Annotation | The annotation shows careful reading and a clear understanding of the source’s content, quality, and relevance. It clearly explains why the sources were chosen. Offers insight into sources and makes explicit connections to the argument as well as to other chosen sources. | The annotation shows some understanding of the source’s content, quality, and relevance. It briefly explains why the sources were chosen. Offers some insight into sources but makes few connections to the argument or to other chosen sources. | The annotation shows little to no understanding of the source’s content, quality, and relevance. It does not explain why the sources were chosen. It offers little to no insight into the sources and does not make connections to the argument or to other chosen sources. |
Grammar/Mechanics | MLA or APA is used correctly throughout the annotated bibliography. Sentence structure as well as grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly throughout the annotated bibliography, but with mistakes. Some awkward sentences appear as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | The annotated bibliography contains multiple incorrect sentence structures and lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. |
Creating a Literature Review Rubric
TASK: Create a Literature Review | |||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | |
Introduction of Topic & Research Question | Effectively introduces the topic and direction of the literature review. The research question is clearly identified and connected to the content of the review. | Introduces the topic of the literature review. The research question is identified and connected to some of the content in the review. | Does not introduce the topic of the literature review. The research question is either not identified or not connected to the content of the review. |
Coverage of Content/Organization | Covers appropriate content related to the topic and research question in depth. Sources are cited correctly. The organization of material is clear, effective, and appropriate. | Covers some of the content related to the topic and research question. Sources are cited with minor mistakes. The organization of material is not as clear, effective, and/or appropriate as it could be. | Does not cover appropriate content related to the topic and research question. Sources are cited incorrectly. The organization of material is not clear, effective, and/or appropriate. |
Meaningful Discourse | Demonstrates a clear understanding of the available research about their topic. It situates ideas in existing discourse. | Demonstrates a partial understanding of the available research. It partially situates ideas in existing discourse. | Does not demonstrate an understanding of the available research. Ideas are not situated in existing discourse. |
Essay Form | The literature review is in essay form. | The literature review is mainly or partly in essay form. | The literature review reads like a list of sources summarized. |
Consideration of Audience | Addresses the target audience. | Addresses the target audience. | Does not clearly address the target audience. |
Connections to Discipline/Synthesis of Ideas | Creates “wholes” out of multiple parts, synthesizes, and/or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, and/or theories. | Struggles to make “wholes” out of multiple parts, synthesize, and/or draw conclusions by combining examples, facts, and/or theories. | Does not create “wholes” out of multiple parts. Does not synthesize or draw conclusions. Merely summarizes material from different sources. |
Grammar/Mechanics | MLA or APA is used correctly throughout. Sentence structure as well as grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly throughout, but with mistakes. Some awkward sentences appear as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | Lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. |
TASK: Create an Abstract | |||
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||
Above Satisfactory (A/B) | Satisfactory (C) | Below Satisfactory (D/F) | |
Purpose | The abstract is clear, concise, and relevant. | The abstract could be clearer, more concise, and/or more relevant. | The purpose of the abstract is not clear, concise, and/or relevant. |
Methodologies / Methods | Identifies the methods / methodologies used to support the thesis or answer the research question in an organized, specific, and concise manner. | Identifies the methods / methodologies used, but does not show how they support the thesis or answer the research question. | Does not identify the methods / methodologies used or how they support the thesis or answer the research question. |
Evidence | Identifies key evidence found within the research clearly and concisely, and connects it to the purpose of the study. | Identifies evidence found within the research but does not clearly connect the evidence to the purpose of the study. | Does not identify key evidence. |
Results/Conclusion | Provides an explanation of what was expected, discovered, accomplished, collected, and produced throughout their research in an organized, specific, and concise manner. | Provides an incomplete or confusing explanation of what was expected, discovered, accomplished, collected. | Does not provide an explanation of what was expected, discovered, accomplished, collected, and/or produced throughout their research. |
Grammar/Mechanics | The abstract is the appropriate length and MLA or APA is used correctly throughout. Sentence structure as well as grammar, punctuation, and capitalization are used correctly with minimal to no errors. | Generally, MLA or APA format is used correctly throughout the abstract, but with mistakes. It’s not quite the appropriate length, and some awkward sentences appear as well as some grammar, punctuation, and capitalization errors. | The abstract contains multiple incorrect sentence structures and lacks the use of correct MLA or APA format. There are significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization, and it is not long enough. |